Note: This is the old stuff. This page is not being updated. New pilot reports are on the Pilot reports page.
Vince Frazier's F-1H Rocket Crazy Horse flies!!!
10-8-04: Some digital cameras have a delay while
they focus. Here's what you get when you take a photo of a Rocket fly-by
when using such a camera. DOH!
Jim Truitt's RV-8A chase plane. John Crabtree also chased in his RV-6.
Fighting the urge to do a few rolls.
Tammy's happy! She should be... it's really her airplane! I'm just
the builder/pilot.
Vince and John give the traditional (for us anyway) post-flight double high
fives.
After a successful first flight, it's important to drain a few adult beverages.
Several more met their doom at Hornville Tavern after dusk.
Crazy Horse flies!!!
10-08-04: No, not crazy horse flies that you find in a barn yard,
not even Crazy Horse the notable P-51.... I'm talking about MY Crazy Horse
Rocket. It flies! (Well, it's not quite a Mustang... but it's as
close as I'll get unless I hit the lottery!)
About 6 weeks ago I realized that I was 99% done with the plane. I
began an insane schedule and long hours of work to finish up that last 1%.
Assuming that the plane was 99% complete 6 weeks ago, multiply the time I've
spent since then by a factor of 100 to estimate the amount of time the other 99%
took. Exactly 1.22 gadzillion hours. Hmmmm, simple
math. Who knew these things took so long?
BTW, I started this project in 1999. The website soon followed.
Hoards of adoring fans came next (I wish). Soon, I had people calling me
for advice (What were they thinking???!). But now.... I've finally flown
one!!! Now, I can pretend to be an expert and have real BS to back it up!
;-)
My stupendous friend and fellow RV repeat offender, John Crabtree, has been
helping all along. We had put 0.6 hours on the engine previously while
calibrating the GRT EFIS (very nice BTW) and EIS. We had a few things to
fix. One was an oil leak at the vernatherm base gasket which just needed to be
tightened a bit more. The other was to remove the two washers that I added
to the oil pressure relief spring. I had wanted to make sure that the
newly overhauled engine had plenty of oil pressure.... it did! 110psi at
1200 rpm. We all agreed that was probably a bit too high so out came the
washers and the relief valve had the same number of washers that it had prior to
the overhaul: none.
Ahh, I digress, here's the flight report:
John and I did the final checks this afternoon. Then we did a full power run-up
for one minute. The CHTs went up. Up to 405 on the highest cylinder.
Not good, but not too bad. Oil temp took much longer to come up and didn't
really get warm until after the flight began.
After the run-up, I had settled down a bit and decided to do one last quick
taxi, brake check, watch the temps for any upward trend, etc. The
temps had dropped a bit and there was a small crowd gathered around, including
my wife.
I wasn't paying any attention to them. None whatsoever. John
was ready in his RV-6 chaseplane. Grant, Bud, and Gene were manning the
rescue vehicle, a four-wheel drive Ford pickup filled with fire extinguishers,
axes, shovels, etc. Tammy (my wife) and Margie (John's wife) were doing
whatever women do (worrying probably). I don't know. Like I said, I was busy.
I lined up on Hepler's 2400' turf runway 27 and started easing the black knob
forward. Everything sounded good, strong, smooth acceleration.... hmmmm, I
wonder what would happen if I pushed the throttle the remaining 75% of the
way???? I'll have to try that in the future because I was already
flying by then. Heck, I wasn't in any huge hurry to find out whether the
torque would cause problems, so a nice smooth takeoff felt pretty good. I
suppose I used 800', maybe more before breaking ground.
It's right about then that the usual thought goes through my head: "Well, now
we're off. I'll worry about coming back down later."
Seeing as I had only used partial throttle to takeoff, I figured I'd better bump
it up a bit. YEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!! It's like stomping the gas
on my dad's 2002 Corvette. Very smooth, and very powerful. By
now I was passing through 1000' and picking up speed rapidly. I
really don't have a clue as to climb rates, altitudes or speeds, because my eyes
were glued to the EFIS engine page. I was much more concerned
about the temps than the climb rate. Man, I can tell you that the climb
rate and airspeed were just fine and I didn't need a gauge to confirm it.
The oil temp and pressure were fine, fuel flow and pressure was good, CHT's were
climbing. I dropped the nose a bit more. I was somewhere around 1500 -
2000' (Who knows? I was busy). The CHT's peaked just above 400. The
highest peaked at about 445... plenty hot, but they came back down PDQ.
I heard John making his radio calls as he was taking off after I cleared
the area a bit. Our plan was for him to stay on the ground until I was
about a mile out. Our emergency field, Interstate 64, is about 2 miles
from the field, so I was past the point of turning around. BTW, you bet
I'd use that highway if needed! It's lightly traveled and doesn't have
a 20' deep ditch at the end of it like our runway does! The other end
of our runway has a 4' berm just across the road that runs perpendicular
to it. Yikes!
As I leveled off and picked up speed, I started feeling out the
handling and double-checking the rest of the gauges. Everything was in
the green... although the oil pressure was lower than I wanted to see.
I immediately cursed myself for taking out the washers. I plan to
reinstall one washer tomorrow. (More on that at the end of this
section)
By now, I had time to scroll through the EFIS screens and see how fast,
how high, etc. I was tooling along at 165mph and John was rapidly
closing the gap. John pulled in close to check for oil leaks, etc.
Not seeing any, he whipped out his trusty digital camera and told me to
just maintain straight and level for a minute. I took a moment to wave
at him, only to see a look of disgust on his face. I knew
immediately.... dead batteries in the digital camera. DOH!
We were over the interstate between Poseyville and the Wabash river,
temps were OK, so I told John it was time to do some stalls. Les
Featherston had warned me that the pitch feel would be quite heavy at
slow speeds. DAMN! He was right. The first power off (well
pretty low
power anyway), no flap stall took forever. As I let the speed slowly
bleed off from 90 to 80 to 70... I started thinking "Geez, I'm gonna
pull a muscle in my arm doing this." The pitch feel was that heavy!
Yes, I had the trim all the way nose up! (FWIW, it's an RV-4 tail with
manual trim. I had nearly full fuel and nothing in the rear seat or baggage.) Now, I know why you see Rockets at Oshkosh with huge,
custom trim tabs. (I later remedied this problem by adjusting the
elevator trim to have more nose up throw than nose down. This helped
greatly.)
I took my other hand off of the throttle and continued pulling. I don't
recall the IAS at the break, somewhere around 70mph IIRC, but I do know
that there wasn't much of a break, just a lot of turbulence slapping the
stick around.
Temps were still OK, so I pulled on a notch of flaps (manual flaps, my
design, work great, would NOT trade them for electric ever, never, no
way, no how) and tried again. Much the same. A little more
aggressive
stick handling gave a small break somewhere around 66mph IAS.
Then full flaps. Since the temps were OK, I switched on the flight
instrument screen and observed 63mph IAS at the mild break. No wing
drop, just a small burp and pitch downward.
After the stall series, I noticed that the ground was somewhat closer
than before. John said he thought I dropped a thousand feet during the
series. Could be. We were definitely sinking fast. Hmmmm, a
1226#
Rocket does sink a heckuva lot faster than the 1000# RV-6 I've been
flying.
John and I turned 180 degrees and started back towards Hepler. We were
back up to 150 IAS or so, when I decided that I'd give her an
acceleration check. I gave the black knob a push forward to about 1/2
or maybe 2/3 of full. Things got noisier. My head got pushed back.
John started flying backwards. It was awesome.
John and I began setting up our approach to the airport. Everything was
looking OK, handling was good, etc. I decided that I'd let down for a
practice approach down runway 9 at about 120 IAS. Looking good, feeling rock
solid,
probably could have made a nice semi-downwind landing, but this was just
for practice. Or it might be a little tease for the crowd on the
ground.... he, he, he. As I passed the small crowd of upward turned faces, I pushed the power up and YEEEHAAAA!!! up we
went. The floor of the Evansville airspace is 1700' and Hepler sits right
under the northwestern edge. John always
busts
my chops when I encroach on their turf, so I had to put the nose back
down and be a good boy.
A corkscrewing 360 to the left put me on a proper downwind for runway 27. I started pulling levers
and setting up for the real landing. Man, rock solid is the only way to
describe how she feels in the pattern. I was getting about 85-90 on the
approach and the LRI (Lift Reserve Indicator) was sliding slowly toward
the red (stall) line. I think I could have crossed my arm and legs and
taken a nap. Rock solid. The crosswind that was making the windsock
stand out was barely noticeable. I recalled that the mild chop I
encountered earlier in the day when flying John's RV-6. With the Rocket's
heavier wing loading, it was gone.
As I crossed the threshold, pulled a little more power, and started a
gentle flare, I was still getting that rock solid, smooth power feel.
The wheels brushed the grass just as I gave the stick a healthy tug. I
expected a bounce and then a tailwheel touch, but got a slightly more nose down
attitude instead and no bounce whatsoever. I gave the stick another firm
tug and got the most perfect wheel landing I have ever made.
Dang, now I'll be expecting that kind of smooth landing every time!
As I taxied back to the waiting crowd, I noticed for the first time that
I was fairly drenched in sweat. Hmmmm, and it was only 70 degrees out.
I pulled up onto the concrete pad next to the hangar. I could tell that
my wife was greatly relieved. Me too. Then we took some photos and
popped some cold beers! Woo hoo!!!
I do have some comments about the EIS/EFIS combo. They really seem to
work very well, but they have their quirks. One reason that I wasn't
able to monitor the airspeed, altitude, etc as much as I wanted was
because the "Cruise oil pressure" warning was set too high and the EIS
would not leave that display page. That meant that I had to monitor the
engine parameters on the EFIS screen. Yeah, I know that the EIS and
EFIS are supposed to do that for you... but I wanted to see the data
with my own eyes.
Since the EIS was effectively locked on one page, it was actually
somewhat of a distraction. These bugs can be ironed out. It behooves
anyone using this system to really get the darned thing setup BEFORE
flight.
I also got a "Fuel flow too high" on the EFIS each time I put the noise
lever forward. Hmmmm, need to reset that number to a higher value.
So, first flight a success!!! I can't wait to see how fast she'll go
with full throttle... I never had more than about half throttle on this
flight... no kidding! Hmmmm, and it was showing 220 mph IAS at that!
Once again.... WOOOO HOOOOO!!!!
Many Thanks to John Crabtree, Les, Tom, Harry, Fred, Mark, John.... man,
I could name a hundred guys but mostly Thanks go to my ever patient
wife, Tammy.
Vince Frazier
Low oil pressure comments: My cruise oil pressure was 50 psi at 200 degrees F oil temp and 2300 RPM. This is too low.
My engine started life as an O-540-B2B5 with a fixed pitch prop. During the overhaul, we added the goodies to make it an IO-540-C4B5. Lycoming's overhaul manual and their parts manual show that there are 4 different oil pressure relief springs for these engines. According to Sacramento Sky Ranch's website, when you switch from a fixed pitch to a CS prop, you need a different spring. I called the Lycoming tech line (1-800-258-3279, press 1 for tech help) and the gent explained this all to me and said that the different spring would very likely cure my low cruise oil pressure (50psi) and get it up to 80psi where it should be. That's good news. However, it would be nice if seemingly trivial info like this were in the overhaul manuals!
10-17-04:
FWIW, Here's some raw data for an engine with 2.6 hours SMOH. I don't recall if these numbers were 100% full throttle or not as I was varying power a bit. Whatever, this is what I wrote down:
Full Rich, 2600 RPM, 23.5 MP, 6100' altitude, 73F OAT, Fuel Flow 22 gph (probably not accurate), Fuel pressure 28.0, oil pressure 99, oil temp 196, IAS 210 mph (no glfs or wheelpants)
EGT 1209, 1248, 1252, 1234, 1248,1211
CHT 311, 349, 327, 328, 339, 327
Raw data.... I don't claim any of it is or isn't accurate.... that's why there's a testing period assigned to these things!
Stalls with full flaps, power off 62mph IAS, no flaps about 67 IAS. Lots of sink, plenty of buffet, breaks straight ahead.
In 20/20 hindsight it would seem that I would have written more stuff down at various conditions.... well, all I can say is that there are plenty of distractions in the first few hours of a new plane! For example, the oil pressure, which was only 50 at cruise, is now 99(or more) at cruise. This was the result of changing the oil pressure relief spring per Lycoming's recommendation. Now, it's on the verge of being too high! ACK!
I can't wait to fly some more as soon as the wx clears a bit.
Vince
My visit to Les Featherston's Rebel's Bluff on July 5, 2004
My family dropped in on Les Featherston at Rebel's Bluff on July 5, 2004. Les's Rocket is wearing a new paint job that is just plain eye-popping gorgeous. The pictures don't do it justice.
Even though the weather was hotter than blazes, Les patiently gave everyone a ride. My son's girlfriend, Emily Walter, got to ride in the old Aeronca Champ and the Rocket. I asked her which one she liked best and she said "Oh wow, the Rocket was totally cool." Praise like that is hard to beat!!!
Les let me wiggle the stick in the back seat and offered much good advice on flying techniques. I am much indebted to Les for his guidance. (Tom Martin and Harry Paine are also on this list! Thanks to all of you great guys.)
Vince
A Report From My Wife, Tammy
(for women only)
Ladies, have you ever been working in your kitchen and you couldn't find what you were looking for? Well, if your husband builds airplanes then it's probably out in his shop somewhere. My husband has a penchant for kitchen utensils. He claims that he always asks me first. I guess it must be while I'm sleeping.
Vince started building an RV-4 back in 1987. Coincidentally, that is when I began to notice the strange disappearance of my kitchen utensils... such as my ice picks, both of which have been MIA ever since. Then I caught him with my turkey baster. Who knows what it was used for, but it was oily and smelly and I never want it back.
My electric carving knife gets more use making foam seat cushions than it ever does carving turkey. I suppose he can keep that item too.
Even my expensive Pampered Chef utensils are not safe, even though I strictly forbade him from touching them. I found him with my fancy Pampered Chef dough roller, rolling out some fiberglass resin. Lucky for him that the resin was between to layers of saran wrap and he didn't mess up my roller or I'd have messed him up. 'Nuf said on that one and he bought his own roller from Home Depot the next day.
Recently, I found my potpourri crock pot under the engine of the plane. I almost didn't recognize it since he had covered it with tin foil. There was a Dixie cup full of fiberglass resin warming up in it!! YUCK. I told him to get his own $#&*@ crock pot and leave my stuff alone! I'll be glad when he gets this dang airplane done! Tammy
Vince replies: I'm glad she doesn't know the full extent of my thievery! And because I'm so thoughtful, I always get her some new kitchen utensils for Christmas. Yes, nothing says "Love" like new kitchen utensils. They cost less than jewelry and last longer than flowers. Am I a great husband or what?
John Cargill's Rocket
Scott Seabourn's Rocket
6-1-04: Another F-1 takes to the air this morning at 0800 PST. YEA BABY! to quote the father.
Scott Seabourn's beautiful rocket flew this morning for its first test flight. No huge problems, a few minors that will need tending too, but overall flew very nice. I flew chase in my Rocket and it looks like Scott has a fast Rocket, I would say we will be very evenly matched; no surprise there as we have nearly identical airframes with identically built engines and components.
Congrats Scott. I'll let you tell everyone how it flew.
Greg Nelson
Howard Rhode's Rocket
6-1-04: Greetings All
Jim Cash did the honors of first flight for #3 Thursday at 1:30PM CST. I asked Jim due to his background, airmanship, and time in Blackjack. It was a wise choice. He knows more in his little finger than I in my head. He is a class act as well. Charlie Calivas flew chase and provided adult technical supervision. Charlie has the second flying RV-6 with over 1500 hours on it now.
Here are the impressions:
Airframe - Left wing was wing heavy, the right aileron squeeze worked and now it is hands off. Vertical Stab was displaced to the left on purpose and it is perfect with ball centered at all times.
(Tom and Mark- in a ballasted rear seat condition with full fuel the airframe is good to 5 g's for over the tops. Incidence and sweep are spot on and strong as steel.) The airplane stalls with the initial break at 45 knots, we are limiting top end to 210 knots at this time. The airplane tracks arrow straight on the runway and showed gear shuffling decelerating through 30 knots only ONCE, otherwise nothing weird to report.
Avionics- Blue Mountain Efis one is coming around but initially it had many calibration issues. Greg Richter has a fine product, but it is intense to set up. Still working those but getting better.
Engine-(Aerosport) Leak free, strong, smooth. The one big issue is a rich condition with the Airflow injection servo. Engine shakes and barks at full rich high power. We did all the usual injector clean, plug check, idle circuit adjust lean. The two other options are rejet or send it back to Airflow for calibration. Timing on the left mag and coil phasing have not been dismissed as suspects either. The motor has improved big time on day 2 over day 1. Some quick numbers CHT is 397 to 405 on all cylinders during pattern work. Max oil temp in pattern is 210 at 88 F ambient. EGTs are 1250 to 1300 at high power. Need to bump up the governor to raise RPM from 2550 to 2700.
It seems the plenum has solved all the hot stuff that has bothered a couple of airplanes, so carry on with your work on those. Jim commented that the ambient noise is quite low in mine compared to his.........closed cell acoustical foam worked on the upholstery panels. Cockpit temps were fine, I attribute that to the material on firewall and floor. I DIDN'T NACA duct the side, mine is underwing and rear of the plenum. It worked.
Conclusion:
One fine airplane Mark, you can be proud of your product. If the EVO wing is nicer I can't imagine how it could be so! I have been flying garbage scows (MD11) for so long now I had forgotten what a powerful responsive airplane is like. It feels like the T-38, just doesn't roll at 720 degrees/second but God almighty that roll rate really scrambles your brain. I have no autopilot servos and Jim just loved the silky smooth control action (so do I).
I think all of us are building the correct airplane for sport aviation, Mark is selling a terrific kit. It is a trite phrase but keep at it. I remember when Bob Gross flew his and said that I was deep in a mess on something so I know how it is. It took me 6 years to build with significant life experiences tossed in and this by golly is one of them!
Happy Memorial Day, Howard Rhodes
Stu Smith's Rocket
Stu Smith says his Rocket now flying and has about 150 hours on it. I put several pictures of Stu's plenum on the engine page also. Looks great. Stu had this to say:
Hey Vince:
We have not e-mailed in a while. I thought I would send you a couple pictures of the rocket now that construction is complete and life is returning to normal. I flew it in August and finished up all those little details, and paint, about a month ago. I'm quite pleased with the results and it flies great. I'm flying out of Compton airport, about 10 miles south east of Los Angeles International.
I had a beautiful RV 4 while finishing up the project, but ended up selling it because I knew I wouldn't want to fly anything other than the rocket.
Blue Skies - Stu Smith.
Vince:
I did all the cooling stuff. And I still have cooling issues. First flights gave me 450 CHT (hottest cylinder) and 250 oil temp! Uuuggh!
Ramping the air up onto the top third of the front cylinders and blocking off a third of the oil cooler has given me 425 hottest CHT and 210 oil temp. Better, but a long way from what I was hoping for. I am going to continue to dink with the baffling and hope for incremental improvements in cooling. Otherwise, I have some kind of radio interference (it seems like something in my instrument system is giving off RFI???), and that's about it for bugs so far. Actually that's pretty good for a beast like this. I find myself in a turn most of the time to stay within sight of the airport, and the airplane handles very naturally.
(I mentioned to Stu that Mark had said that an smoother exit ramp on the cowl outlet had made a big difference in his cooling. Unfortunately, it didn't work for Stu. Doh!)
The exit ramps made no noticeable difference in CHT temps. I also added a flange at the rear of the bottom cowl to create a low pressure area, with no noticeable results.
Make sure your rudder pedal hardware clears the firewall kickout - my left rudder hung up on the kickout. Stu
Bob Wahl's Rocket
First flight May 2004
Sadly, Bob passed away only a few months later. His family is in my prayers.
Ken Sebok's Rocket
3-3-04: Hey guys- I wanted to let you all know that F-1 #71 took flight this morning for the first time! With lots (and I really mean lots) of help from Eric Henson and Bob Woolley, we finally completed this Rocket (ex-paint) and got the go from our DAR last week.
Bob flew the plane for its initial flight (his 17th first flight in RV/Rocket/Glasair-type planes) and reported that the plane flew perfectly (no airframe adjustments needed). Just a few small items requiring add'l focus, including high CHTs. I'll report more test data as we get collect it. The basics: 1,203 empty weight, std IO-540C4B5, MT 3 blade.
Regards, Ken Sebok
Billy Water's Rocket
Another fine looking machine. This one by Billy Waters
Randy Price's Rocket
Yet another... this one by Randy Price.
Les Featherston's Kittyhawk trip
As part of the Centennial of Flight celebration, Les Featherston had the honor of delivering the Missouri state flag to Kittyhawk, N.C. The Mooney pilot, also from Missouri, accompanied Les. There's lots more details to this part of the story, but I'll just screw them up so I'll let Les send details later.
Les and his wonderful, patient, and supportive wife, Linda, stopped in at Hepler airport on their return trip to Missouri. We had a great time. Les gave me a ride (I've got to get my Rocket done!) and then gave my wife her first Rocket ride. My wife, Tammy, is a bit claustrophobic and never did care much for my RV-4, largely due to the cramped rear seat. But she sure liked the Rocket! Whew! What a relief. Maybe she'll fly with me after all!? She said she was surprised at how roomy the rear cockpit is and mentioned the great visibility.
Les and Linda were treated to the finest Mount Vernon, IN has to offer (not much!). We stopped in at the local Mexican restaurant for supper and had a few margaritas to quench our thirst. More storytelling followed. I think by the end of the evening we all had hoarse voices from talking and laughing. Les's wife, Linda, didn't even complain about sleeping on a cot at our house. Now, that's a GREAT wife. Les and I are both blessed with superb wives. We are lucky guys, for sure!
Les tells me that he is planning to have another fly-in at Rebel's Bluff airport next year. I'm already looking forward to it!
Les Featherston's Rocket First Flight Report
(Les's Rocket started life as a HRII but was finished using F-1 cowl and other fiberglass parts. Hmmmmmmm, that sounds familiar. Vince)
Wedding Announcement!
One cold night in November of 1996, a beautiful young lass from Plaines, Oregon, moved to Midland, Michigan. She took some room in the garage at the home of Mr. Kelly Neeley. Her name was Van’s RV-4 (kit number 4104). A short time, later she was joined by a rough-and-tumble rodeo cowboy from Bakersfield, California whose name was Harmon Rocket II (kit number 64). He admired her lithe figure and graceful movements. She was smitten by his strong good looks, and his powerful countenance.
They lived with Mr. Neeley, until 1998, when they moved to Bolivar, Missouri, where they became engaged and were counseled by Champion (race car driver) Larry Phillips. Mr. Phillips was a very good tutor, and they made a great deal of progress in their relationship.
On December 6th, 1999, they made a shorter move to reside with their wedding coordinator, Les Featherston, in Mt. Vernon, Missouri. Les had been a USAF fighter pilot (F-100, many, many years ago), and was soon to be retired from United Airlines (6/2001). The couple had many challenging days and nights of prenuptial counseling, but all agreed that they were a match made for Heaven.
At 6:23PM on Monday evening August 11th, the happy couple were joined to become “one” by the Reverend J. Neal Sowers, D.A.R., at a lovely T-hangar wedding on Johnson County Executive Airport, Olathe, Kansas.
The brides gown (PLANNED to be delivered later) will be a spectacular Pearlescent White, with a burgundy sash. Her maid-of-honor was Garmin 430 GPS/Comm, and she was attended by Dynon D-10, TruTrak 250AS Autopilot, Apollo SL-40 Comm, and Garmin 327 Transponder. The matron-of-honor was Vision Micro Systems 1000, and her flower girl was PS Engineering 1000 Stereo CD Intercom. The corsage was an ATD collision avoidance device.
The groom wore a silver tuxedo which showed off his very masculine form. His Best Man was Lycoming IO-540 C4B5 dynoed at 262HP. The grooms attendants were the Light Speed Engineering brothers Plasma II, and Plasma III (electronic ignition), Hartzell 80” CS Prop, and the miniscule “SkyTec” of lightweight starter fame. The ring bearers were B&C, the alternator boys.
The invitees on the very prestigious guest list (although not all could come) were none other than Richard Van Grunsven, and John Harmon, parents of the bride and groom; Mark Frederick, their Godfather; Mike Wonder, John Zidek, and chase pilot Walt Frazier. Many others need honorable mention, and I apologize if I have left anyone out; Mrs. Lynda Featherston who kept their relationship from floundering on several occasions; Vince Frazier, who constantly gave the couple encouragement; Honorary Chase Pilot Tom Martin; Harry Paine who headed the rehearsal program.
The excited couple left on their honeymoon the next morning at 8:56AM, lifting off on a journey they hope will be filled with many, many Knots, and many Happy Landings.
They will reside in a large hangar at Rebel’s Bluff Airport, (N37 06.1 and W93 52.2) near Mt. Vernon, Missouri, and would very much enjoy your visiting. They request that you plan to come after they finish a hectic 25 hour adjustment period. The happy couple asked me to share with you that they are expecting: At 7,500’ with 21.8”of M/P, and 2300 RPM they believe they will have 206 Knots. Thus they have chosen to call themselves N206KT.
**********************************************************************************************
Yes! The beast is alive. I flew the Rocket today. Wow, what a ride. I took off at Johnson Cty AP in Kansas City at 8:56AM and flew for about 15 minutes. The RPM was too high at full prop so we tuned it back to 2600. The exhaust pipe was chaffing the cowling and we installed a bit of .025 with pop rivets (God bless the man that invented those), and she was perfect. No roll tendency, no problems, just sling shot dragster into the atmosphere. (Real 3,500'/min) I flew it again for 30 minutes overhead, and then launched for Rebel's Bluff. 150 statute miles in 41 minutes----Oh Man! It has 21.8" of manifold pressure at 8500' and 2300 Rpm burns 12.2 gph at 205 knots. I think I have gone to Heaven! I cannot believe what a different airplane it is from my RV-4. Quite heavy in pitch (which is good for IFR) and very nice in roll. Very sensitive, but very friendly. I cannot believe I own such a fantastic machine.
No, she is not painted yet! Fuselage is sort of a camouflage colored primer. The wings and vertical tail are still aluminum. The worst color is the pukey greenish cowling and wing tips. The ram effect of the forward facing fuel injector gives an estimated 2" additional manifold pressure at 7,500.' It was a real "Rocket" ride. Oil temps are very good for an 87F day. About 213F. It flies straight as an arrow. Now it is time to commit to the paint scheme. Gotta go fly the other 23 hours off. LES
*****
I flew my Harmon Rocket II, N206KT, for the first time on August 12th. What a
ride! The taxi out is very intimidating with that rumble in front of your feet
just shaking the beast gently. I told myself that I have flown all this
time up to now, and if and when there had been an emergency, I just handled it,
so why was today going to be any different? The power comes in, and as Jackie
Gleason said so well, "Away we go!" Things were happening so fast that if there
had been a problem, I would not have been a reliable witness at the hearing, so
I just hung on and enjoyed the ride. Airspeed comes in such big doses that it is
hard to comprehend. I wanted about 110 knots indicated to climb, so I pulled the
nose up and saw 110 and then 120, so I pulled again, and saw 130, then I REALLY
PULLED and she was at 140 and climbing about 3,000ft/min on a 95F day.
Everything went perfectly, and the chase RV-6 hovered around about 2,000 feet
below me and 4 miles behind. No disrespect to the -6, but this baby really goes.
Very, very light on the roll inputs, and very solid on the pitch feel. I
couldn't believe all the years of work, and months of planning, and weeks of
effort, and days of checking everything over and over was finally coming true in
this moment. Kept it overhead the airport, just in case, and tried some slow
flight and approach to stalls.
Then it was the "big" moment. Could I get this thing on the ground in one piece? And "piece" it was, of cake that is! She is so docile that you cannot believe it. I was so happy! Remember all the help you guys gave me on the "list" trying to come up with a name for the nose art? Well, it came to me as I taxied in, I am going to call my Rocket "Airgasm"! That's what it was, so that's the name. I have now flown it 14 times, and even got a ferry permit to fly a short (in a Rocket it's short) cross country to Wichita, KS, and back, for some instrument adjustments.
This "Rocket" thing is the real deal. Thanks, John, for such a wonderful airplane. Les
12-07-03: Hi Vince, I read your post re-chutes, and moving the seat back. I moved the rollover hoop back 1 1/2 inches and put a polyethylene bucket seat in place of Van's back board. I flew it about 3 times for 30 minutes, and thought it was good. But then I flew it 1:50 to Tuscaloosa, AL, to the paint shop (Razors Edge RV) and was blown away. It was a trip I had flown several times in the RV-4, and the Rocket. I couldn't believe how much more comfortable it was. Blew me away. There is about a 6 pound weight penalty, but for the comfort factor it was worth it. And besides it is 6 lbs. I will use on every flight unlike my autopilot, or GNS-430. But I digress, the 1 1/2 inch move back was fantastic. It makes all the difference in the world. I measured the "face distance" in the RV-4 and found 21 1/2", and the Rocket at 25." So I used 1 1/2 of the 2 1/2" for me. The back seater still has more room than the RV-4, and much better ankle/shin room because of the wrap around shape of the bucket seat. The bucket is quite large, and much more comfortable than the Jon Johannson seats. They were just too narrow (12") for my big A#%.
Tell everyone to take their airplanes to Razors Edge RV for painting in Tuscaloosa, AL. Mike Taylor will do an excellent job. He's on the Van's World Wide Air Force website. Stay in touch, and tell everyone the Rebel's Bluff RV Fly-In is on May 1st. See ya, Les
A Rocket built by Clarence McClean
The Rocket in the foreground was reportedly built by Clarence McClean. Bob Gross is flying escort.
Harry Paine visits Carmi
Harry Paine had asked if I'd like to have a ride in his Rocket. You bet I would! Harry and Bob Pattee stopped in at Carmi on the way home from the East coast.
It was a typical July day in the Midwest. Temperature was about 99 and the humidity was 99% also. IIRC, that gives a heat index of HELL. The stiff breeze out of the southwest only served to make the TOLs more exciting. After a brief BS session, Harry and I piled into the Rocket. A few hundred feet later and we were airborne. A couple minutes later, on the downwind leg of the pattern, and we were at 3500'. Very nice indeed!
I've been lucky enough to snag a ride with Tom Martin a couple times. The takeoff in Harry's plane confirmed what I'd seen before... smooth power and rapid acceleration. The growl of that big six cylinder Lycoming up front rumbles up through your feet, past your butt, and rattles your big, toothy grin as you get pushed back into the seat by the acceleration. It's hard to keep from yelling "Yeehah" into the mic. The climbout is more of the same. Your jaw is hanging open with awe..."Somebody built this in their garage?" "Not possible! This is way too cool." protests your Cessna conditioned brain. But it's true! Is this a great country or what?!
We slowed down for a little slow flight. Harry dropped the flaps and turned the stick over to me. I didn't have any rudders in the back seat. We did several stalls and when the left wing dropped it caused me to stomp on the right footwell out of habit. We had the Rocket all over the sky, but I loved every minute of it. The Rocket behaved much like my old RV-4, giving a little shudder before the break, dropping the left wing slightly, and recovering quickly. Harry pointed out that we probably lost a bit more altitude than you might in an RV-4. The heavier weight and smaller wing do have an effect. However, jamming the noise lever forward positively puts an end to any altitude loss. "This is so cool."
The big Lycoming was starting to need some cool air after 10 minutes of this, so Harry took over and let the speed build up... and up.... and up. "Woo hoo! I have got to get one of these!" I asked Harry how he handles a descent to pattern altitude. I wanted to know if he planned a leisurely descent from miles out, to avoid overcooling the engine, while meticulously monitoring temps and RPMs, etc, etc. His procedure was a little different from the fixed pitch RVs that I've grown accustomed to. I'm not sure, but I think it went like this: Pull the prop and power back a bit, roll into a 90 degree left bank, and go screaming down toward the ground. Once again, "Not possible! This is way too cool." protests my brain.
Soon we were on short final, skimming the steamy cornfields at the north end of runway 18. As always a few blackbirds went whizzing by much too close for comfort. Harry made a nice wheel landing into the quartering crosswind. The springy titanium gear shrugged off the heat soaked runway expansion joint bumps easily. We turned off at the intersection without any difficulties. It was about now that I realized how hot it was getting under the greenhouse of a canopy. "SO WHAT... this is too cool!"
Harry coasted up to the gas pumps for a load of blue juice. Poor guy. I don't think he's accustomed to the jungle humidity we have here. He looked like a wet rag doll as he filled the tanks. I offered again to drive over to one of the local choke and pukes, but Bob and Harry had another date. They were headed to Les Featherston's for their overnight stop. Lucky guys. I'm sure Les took care of them and got them cooled and refreshed.
Hey Harry, thanks for stopping in! I really enjoyed it. Vince
Funny stories...
Rocket ride givers:
I give a lot of rides in my Harmon and over the years I have had a lot of interesting passengers and have heard some pretty outrageous things from the back seat, but last night's comment is worth sharing.
The passenger was a woman, a long time friend of my wife. She had never been in a small plane and when asked if she wanted a ride, she did not hesitate. During the take off roll, and up to about 2000 feet, she never stopped laughing and shouting; I knew this was going to be fun. We leveled off and she calmed down enough to look around and down, and she said all those things that people say in their first plane ride.
I give very gentle rides to timid passengers, it is not my intention to scare anyone from a second flight but on our way back to the airport we passed over a Cessna 172, he was about 1000 feet lower and going 90 degrees to our course. Without thinking, I had no choice, I dropped my right wing swooped down to blow past this guy. With the descent I was probably going well over 230mph, it was perfect evening with no bumps so there was no feeling of speed. That is until you pass someone who is going less than half your speed.
She was surprised that I would get close to another plane, and I was at least 500 feet from it when we went by it, and she asked, "what is wrong with that plane?!!" I replied "nothing, it is a training aircraft from a local flying school" and she replied, after a pause, "You mean they can teach you to fly backwards"!!! Tom Martin
I too had a interesting passenger yesterday. We are having a small air fair at my local airport, APV, and have several CAF aircraft on display. An SNJ, Navy version of the AT-6, arrived a day early to give some promotional rides. One of the high rollers cancelled and my building partner Jack, or KABONG, as he likes to call himself got to take his place. I asked the pilot if he would mind if I flew a little formation with him to get a couple of pictures. Anyway, besides the pilot a lady crew chief came along and as a joke I asked her if she wanted to come along, she did.
At first, she didn't believe that I could keep up with the SNJ. I let the SNJ get completely airborne before I took the runway. After my normal TO, at the end of the runway, the Rocket was already several hundred feet above the SNJ and about a 1/2 mile back. The Rocket quickly closed the gap and I was able to fly formation for a couple of minutes on the SNJ.
Once the photos were taken, we departed the formation and I decided to show her the plane. I did a couple of aileron rolls to check out her system (I don't try to get people sick) and she was doing nice. Next she asked to do a loop. So, I showed her one. Then she asked if she could do one. I said OK but that I would be guarding the stick to make sure things don't go wrong. Of course, she didn't pull hard enough at the start of the loop and we got a little slow at the top. At the top, the plane stalled and did that little shake it does under those conditions. I helped her recover and finished the loop. While this was happening, she said that both she and the plane had just had an **gasm.
She is a nurse, a pilot, a CAF member, not bad looking, and single. She is even thinking about getting an RV after the ride. Tom Gummo
Bob Gross's flight reports
6-18-03:
Flight test continues, 13 hours so far. No major problems other than a clogged injector at 8.5 hours.I am gathering performance data. Other than high altitude cruise, it all looks pretty good. Last week I put in a 6 channel EGT instrument. I always said I'd never do it but....I was wrong. Probably will do the same with the CHT now.
CHT runs hottest leveling at 10500 feet at 120 knots at 420 deg. Cruise temps run around 170. Don't forget it is HOT here, about 35 deg F warmer than std. Temp runs at about 380 during climb at lower altitudes.
Oil runs hottest taxiing in hitting 210 deg. In flight it runs 170 at 55% cruise to 195 at 75% cruise.
I did see 220 once in the pattern doing Touch and Go's.
I noticed my exhaust pipes are banging on the crosstube between the lower engine mount pads. It seems the thrust from the down turned pipes is pushing the pipes upward and causing contact. I put some firesleeve on the tube for now and will watch to see what happens.
So far my regret list has the mentioned EGT and CHT gauges. rear rudder pedals will be redone, and I'll never paint one again.
MY "oh yeah baby that worked like a charm list"...
Air vent on center console. Perfect. It blows on my cajones and upward to keep me cool. Doesn't trip intercom squelch. At high cruise speeds, I can hear the air blast thru vent as I move the little butterfly valve. Glad I got this one right!
Heater vent on center console. Same as above. Don't know how it will work for rear pax in winter.
Insulating firewall. No heat blasts ever from between my feet. The sound from the engine is quite low as well. Floors don't get hot either. I used cheapo insulation from JC Whitney and glued thin carpeting on it to match the rest of the ship.
Fuel flow. Put in a JPI FS-450. Did one calibration step. Last fillip called for 38.0 gallons, the pump metered in 37.93 gallons. nothing's wrong with that!
I use two stock Bendix mags with "Shower of sparks" booster. Works fantastic. Starts easily when hot. no impulse couplings.
The little Skytec starter spins like mad powered by a $32 gel cell (#2 power cable).
The Suzuki alternator is working flawlessly.
I'm using the instruments from Vans. I took apart the EGT last night. To my amazement, they are very well made. So far they work as advertised, except the MAP reads a bit high. I'm going to try and adjust it.
Baffling and oil cooler. Seems to work fine. No complaints especially considering the warm WX here.
Interesting observations....
1. The canopy is WAY easier to lock now.
2. The Matco brakes work well. When new would hold 1500 rpm. Now hold at 1800 rpm. It's bizarre how the wheels toe out when holding the brakes at 1800 rpm!
3. All wheel shaking comes from brakes around 13 knots. Slowly decelerating thru 13 knots with no brakes means no shakes. If I brake hard for one second when I feel the shake then let go, I can get by with as little as 4 little shakes. This technique gets thru he shake speed quickly. Wood strips will come later.
4. Three point landings are awkward as tail won't stick down. Wheel landings are REAL nice. Gear tracks straight easily with either style landing. I set my gear to 1 deg toe in 3 point attitude with no fuel in ship, using grease plates under wheels. No regrets here.
5. My favorite approach speed 78 knots. All speed is lost in the big 50 foot flare. I do all landings power off, ( engine make a cool burbling sound at idle) still practicing for that elusive 18th engine failure (been 13 years since number 17).
6. It comes down nicely. My flaps only go to 36 degrees. It's PLENTY with idle power!
7. Neighbors say it cuts a nice line when flying by. I usually enter upwind at 210 knots to allow room on downwind to decelerate to flap speed. The prop/engine is reported to be quiet and smooth. They say it has a cool whistling sound as well.
8. Fuel load makes a big difference. At these FL warm temperatures, I see 2400 FPM during initial climb with full fuel. With half tanks, I see 3100 fpm. Really ear popping. I can takeoff, pull 25 deg up, 30 deg left bank, and roll wings level onto downwind at up to 1300-1800 feet.
9. Absolutely no aileron bump at full throw. It rolls quite fast BTW, causing the BMA efis to display Re-erect every time.
10. Ailerons are light as a feather at slow speeds. Get real heavy at high speed. It feels about right.
11. Bumpy air. I reset my yellow arc to 165 knots as it feels about right. Above this speed, turbulence hits pretty hard and fast. I can fell the tail jiggling in the rudder pedals at these speed. I assume its from the whole aft fuse twisting. Nothing to scare anyone, some airplanes do this especially where a big tail comes to a narrow point at the attach areas, leaving less torsional stiffness to hold things in place. Anyhow, I slow to below 165 knots in bumpy air. Gives a more solid feeling. Absolutely no fishtailing yaw in turbulence with the F1 tail.
12. Did a loop at 180 knots. Very BIG and slow. Took both hands to get 3 G. Elevator quite heavy. No worries about ever over G-ing this ship. It should be much lighter with a rear passenger. Did a loop at 165 knots. Lot easier, still real big and slow. Flies over the top nicely at 65 knots. Loops ok at 2.5 G as well. Nice to have all that power!
13. It takes two gallons to climb to 7500 feet.
14. I climb at 140 knots to give 1000 FPM at 25 squared. 120 knots gives 1700 FPM. 20 GPH.
15. Its still climbing over 1100 fpm as you reach 10500 feet @ 120 knots (highest CHT)
16. Cruise descent makes about 210 knots TAS at 800 FPM
17. Last flight, got 202 knots TRUE at 70% pwr/7500 feet. about 13.9 GPM. (WOT/2400 RPM)
18. The big Lyc is cooled by airspeed and lots of it. The faster you go, the cooler it runs. I ran at 500 feet WOT and the oil ran 175, cht 370 and airspeed bouncing around 210 knots.
19. Added one quart oil so far in 13 hours. The cylinders are new ECI classic steel units.
More later. Warmest regards, Bob Gross
6-13-03: The F1 made 213 KTAS this AM at 500 feet full push, OAT 79 deg F.
6-6-03: Flew 2 hours this AM for a total of 4.4 so far. Sorry to keep bothering you the details, bu I figure it might be helpful someday. Ran at 10500 feet for an hour today. Speeds not quite what I was expecting, but is was 18 deg C OAT and I was more likely running at 1300 feet density altitude. The view and ride is nice at 10000 feet. Cruise descent at 500 FPM gives about 213 knots TAS.
Did a speed run at 8000 feet. Full throttle about 22" and 2400 rpm. This should be around 65 % pwr. Anyway, averaged 202 knots. I am happier yet.
Actually had some fun today. I stopped worrying a the CHT as it appears they run at 400 in a slow "ear popping" climb (its warm here...temp 29 deg C). 380 during 75% cruise and 350 at 10,000 feet leaned to 11.2 per hour. All good. Oil ran at 175 during cruise and 200 in the pattern. The cowl, baffles and oil cooler are doing a good job. Don't expect to need to modify the cowling etc. (knock on wooden head)
Did a couple touch an goes a the local airport. WHHEEEEE. It went like this...
Touchdown, throttle open, flaps up, yank (30 degrees up) and turn left (30 deg bank). Each one saw 3100 fpm at 100 KIAS steady, and rolled wings level on downwind at 1500 feet! I can't wait for cool WX!
Done 3 wheel landings now. This thing does fantastic wheel landings. It tracks very straight to my amazement.
Got the autopilot to couple to the GPS and track perfectly. Didn't work last time due to me leaving a jumper off the A/P connector. My pitch control module trims the wrong direction in the altitude hold mode. Should be an easy software fix. Next flight Will be to adjust the rigging and calibrate the fuel flow computer.
Like General Jim said, it really is "a kick in the pants to fly" and worth every frustration to reach this stage. Don't give up, keep at it, doing at least one small task EVERY SINGLE DAY.
I am prototyping an alternate air inlet for the F1. Should have it available next month. It'll be easy to retrofit, taking about 30 minutes to install/overnight for sealant to cure. It's a spring loaded door setup. No cables!
More details later. Warmest regards, Bob Gross
6-3-03: Well this morning at 0700 I pushed the throttle to the wall with my neighbor Tony Klopp passing over in an RV-8 to fly chase. It accelerates quickly reaching flying speed within a few seconds. Raising the nose to about 25 deg starts the ears popping as I eased the Rocket into a left climbing turn to prepare for a quick landing should the need arise. I leveled at 3000 feet and reduced to power to keep the CHT under control. Accelerating was the ticket and blowing air on them slowly started to cool things off. As the F1 accelerated to 150 knots, the temp came down to 425 deg and stayed there. The oil which had stabilized at 195 deg began to come down and settled at 180 deg.
I kept the F1 in a lazy left turn over the airport while the RV-8 hopelessly turns inside of me trying to get close enough for an inspection. Finally I had to slow to 100 knots so he could take a look. Everything was fine. At this power setting, each time I looked at the GPS speed it was around 172 knots. More speed checking in the future. I did a stall series to validate the airspeed indicator at low speeds and it seemed right on.
The stall is very sharp with no warning, breaking straight ahead. During this slow flight, the CHTs fell and the oil temp rose quickly to 200 deg F. After this, I accelerated to cruise speed again, played with the toys a bit, engaged the Navaid and put it a left turn and it held perfectly. briefly engaged it into GPS ground track hold which it did. The moving map computer was moving perfectly, but didn't get a chance to play any mp3 tunes this flight. I did a 2 G turn to check the BMA EFIS G meter with was working normally with the newly upgraded firmware.
All in all, it was so uneventful, that I actually enjoyed it, and a looking forward to the next in a couple days. I am following the EAA's flight test plan, which was provided to me from the EAA flight adviser. This program was required by the Insurance company (Falcon) to get this bird insured. BTW, they lowered my rate to $2580 which I was told is the lowest rate one can get on an F1 ($80K hull).
Here is what I observed:
Altitude Sea Level.
OAT 27 deg C
Rate of climb at Vy (87 KIAS) about 2500
fpm
Takeoff weight with 28 gallons fuel
1668 lbs.
max cht at top of climb 3000 feet 475
deg F yikes!
CHT during 75%cruise 435 deg F.
max oil temp 200 during stalls.
max oil temp at 75% power 180 deg F.
EGT
1200 deg F.
max oil temp during climb 195 deg F.
Stall flaps down 48 KIAS
Stall clean 52KIAS
Speed at 20" 2100 rpm 151 KIAS.
Speed at 24" 2400 rpm 171 KIAS
It flew smooth and straight other than the slightest roll to the right about 1 deg per second. Yaw was straight at cruise speeds ( I set the VS LE with no offset) Pitch trim was normal and the elev/stab was nearly faired (slightly TE low), no adjustment needed. Landing was easy and it tracked straight, doing a little wobble decelerating thru 15 knots. Getting off the brakes stopped the shake. All in all no squawks other than the wing trim. So the oil cooler is working well. I hope the CHTs come down as the engine breaks in.
You know, after letting this magnificent event sink in thru the day, I forgot to mention something...how it flies. Well, The ailerons are light as a feather, with dizzying speed. The rudder is stiff, but effective, and the elevators feel real firm, yet responsive like a P-51. Flying it fast gives that great feeling where just a tiny pitch change results in a high vertical speed.
I
had the opportunity to fly an RV-8 last night to get warmed up. It flies very
much like an '8 except for the following: Obviously the power seemingly gives 10
times more acceleration (whoosh), the ailerons feel the same only faster,
the rudder is the same, the elevator is solidly heavier (in a good way), and
the thing requires every bit of up elevator to get the tailwheel to stick to
the ground during landing. I imagine it does beautiful wheel landings. I
took my headset off in the '8 and sampled the deafening racket. I did the
same in the F1 and noticed it was WAY quieter, not much more than my
Cherokee. The soundproofing really helps along with the fuselage side
panels.
That's it for now. Next flight should
be on Wed if tomorrows inspection goes ok. Bob Gross
John Wach's Rocket
11-24-03: John Wach's Rocket. 127JW has a aerosport power engine with his suggested modifications of pistons, flow cylinders, aerobatic conversion, 1/2 lightspeed plasma 3, Airflow Performance fuel injections, MT prop and chrome (that doesn't help but it looks better). Plane is set up for IFR with a Garmin stack. I'll attach a couple of picture to this. That RV6 is the other plane that I built 4 years ago. All are welcome to stop by the Aurora airport and see it. I'll be stuck here for another 25 hours. As far as the heat, I used two heat muffs set up in series which seems right now to really put out the heat if needed. All Engine temps seems to be operating very low considering the application, but the day was 50 degrees so I'm sure that helped a lot. If anyone would like to get a hold of me my phone number is 847-259-4570 evenings. That's all I can think of. John Wach
Jim Frey's Rocket
5-23-03: Jim Frey's Rocket. No info, but it looks nice too.
Tom Martin's third Rocket flies
5-11-03: Tom's third Rocket! Hey Tom, quit showing off. Those of us who are still trying to finish our first Rocket are getting mad! :-) Vince
5-11-03: F1 guys I have a few more flights on the plane now, 8.0 hours total time. I like the three blade Hartzell, it is smooth and quieter than my two blade. On take off I feel that this prop pulls better than my two blade, this surprised me but this is the exact same prop that Bruce Bohannan uses, and he has tested a few. The only disadvantage that I can see over the two blade is the extra cost and the added weight. The MT is lighter but a few more bucks; where does it end! The Nav-aid that I installed is a beautiful thing, today I had to fiddle with the batteries in my GPS; flip on the wing leveler and change the batteries. In my other plane this would have been a heads down, up, down, up kind of a job.
At 180 indicated the control surfaces feel very much like the HRII, at 200 indicated the elevator is heavier in pitch and it does load up increasingly with speed. This is not a bad thing, the HRII is probably a little too light in pitch. In discussions with Kevin Horton he has given me some stick force parameters to check, and I will do this on both planes. The elevator has more surface area than my RV8 tail on the HRII and my trailing edges on the F1 come to a point rather than the joggle. The extra weight of the Hartzell on the front may also affect elevator feel. It is much, much more solid though when it comes to holding altitude. Also I do notice the extra elevator on final, this is a good thing as my flares can use all the help that I can get!
I stalled the plane today, it indicated around 65mph clean. A normal RV type stall. I also rolled it for the first time today, yehaaa. There is no little bump in the ailerons that you feel in the van's wing when you push the ailerons a bit, another pleasant surprise.
The gear leg dampeners continue to do their job and I can see no apparent wear on the tires so far. I have tightened up the big nuts on the top of the gear legs a couple of times. They should seat before too long.
When I landed a friend pointed out one of my tail wheel chains needed attention. The little spring clip had spread open. It was my intention to install the Jantzi Steering Link like the one on my other plane but I had not yet done so. I have just placed my order with Terry.
And yes I have the two inch exhaust. Mark tells me that it attracts women. Unfortunately that has not yet been my experience although men seem to like the sound. Perhaps Mark has a special edition. Tom
A few details from Tom about the first flight:
Ok a few more details. The plane is rock solid, a different feel than the HRII, not better, not worse, just different somehow. It is similar in roll but a bit heavier in pitch. I put this down to the larger elevator. The electric elevator trim seems well matched to the elevator and the plane is easier to trim straight and level than my HRII with the manual trim. I like the feel of the elevators.
The three blade prop is quite similar to the two blade at 24 squared but smoother at the lower RPMs where I normally cruise. It is a bit different seeing that three blade spin to a stop when you shut it down, and I am always hitting my head on the damn blades! (dumb canuck)
I could not feel any shake or vibration in the gear at all. At this point I have not yet had an observer follow when I taxi to check it out for movement. I appears that the wood dampeners that I added are doing their job.
The plane needed to have a light wing tweaked and it looks like I need a rudder tab, but other than that it fly's straight. I do not have any speed #s at this time, nor will I until later in the test period. It is sufficient to say that I now have both the first and second fastest planes in my area! not bad for a farmer eh? Tom Martin
3-3-03: Here is a picture of my new plane #58 and Wes Kings' #54 in the shop on a cold winter day. Tom Martin
Tom Martin's first Rocket,
the Oshkosh Award Winner
"After I had flown many delightful hours in my
RV4 I started to think of things that I would change if I was to build another one. A
wider fuselage with more leg room for the passenger was a must and it would have to carry
more baggage. My RV4 was fast, as fast as many, but when you get used to the speed you
always want more so, of course, this new dream plane would have to have a larger engine.
Above all the plane would not give up any of the flying qualities that made the RV4 a joy
to fly.
It was then that I read an article about the Harmon Rocket. I could not believe that John
had read my mind! The plans and parts were ordered and 17 months later I was in the air.
The plane is pretty much stock and the flight numbers are exactly as John Harmon said they
would be.
I have since sold the plane and am in the final stages of another Harmon Rocket. My last plane took me to Florida twice, Oshkosh three times, New York, New Orleans, Austin, Chicago, Detroit, Buffalo, Montreal, Toronto and to too many small airports to mention. The power and range have opened up a whole new realm of flight for me and I can hardly wait to get my next bird in the air." Tom Martin
Tom Martin's second Rocket
Now owned by Dave Lind as of 4-20-05
The Memphis Belle, a B-17 WWII bomber is at a local
airport for a wing AD. This is the aircraft that the movie of the same name
featured. I took the opportunity to have Wes King (#54) to take some pictures of my
rocket in front of the airplane. Tom Martin
2500 rpm 200.5 knots 231 mph
2400 rpm 197 knots 227 mph
2300 rpm 195.2 knots 225 mph
2100 rpm 189.6 knots 218 mph
I only leaned at 2300 and 2100 rpm with fuel flows of 13 gph and 11.1 gph. 190 knots on eleven gallons is pretty cool!!!
Tom Martin
Here are some real world numbers for you to play with. This is the kind of Sunday morning flying that I do. I left St.Thomas, CYQS, climbed to 7500 feet, flew to Midland, CYEE 125.7 nm, left there and flew to Brampton CNC3, 55.4 nm, and returned to CYQS, 80.3 nm. The last two flights were at 4500 feet. Cruise settings were 23 inches and 2100 rpm. Cruise climbs are at 23 squared. Total time was 1.7 hours. At 7500 feet I was indicating ground speeds of 180 knots in calm winds. Fuel burns were 10.5 gph rich of peak. However when you take the traffic patterns and three take offs and landings into account the average speed dropped to 153 knots and the average fuel burn climbed to 12.4 gph. There is no time to do accurate leaning on 50 knot legs so burns are a bit higher, and average speeds take a kick when you include circuit time but that is what actually happens and should be taken into account when planning cross country flights in these planes. If your trips are over two hours in length plan for 180 knots and eleven gallons, if you are short hauling it, doing half hour flights, then 160 knots and 12.5 gallons. If you use these numbers for flight planning from wheels up to wheels down you will seldom be far off the mark in terms of time en route and you will be on the safe side of your fuel calculations. Tom Martin
Copied from Tom's "For Sale" ad on Ebay, 2-7-03:
This new aircraft has only 165 hours since new. If you
desire an aircraft that will blow the socks off all the spam cans at your
airport this is the bird. People leave the coffee shop and come and look at
the plane every place it goes. Red line speed is 270mph, and the 75% speed
at 8000 feet is 230 mph. 500 to 600 nm cross country treks are possible in
three hours with reserve. There is lots of storage room with a limit of 100
lbs, depending on passenger weight. The engine is a stock IO-540C4B5
Lycoming that was overhauled at a certified shop and has flow balanced brand
new Lycoming cylinders. It bench tested 270hp. The empty weight is less than
1200 lbs, you do the math, 1200 lbs, 270hp, hmmmmm. The propeller is a new
Hartzell and has a polished aluminum factory spinner. I built the plane, it
is my third project. The first was a RV4, and the second another Harmon
Rocket II. That plane won a workmanship award a Oshkosh 99 and the plane
that I am selling is every bit as nice with some added features. Features
like improved storage lockers, leather seats, full lighting, rear rudder
pedals, and complete engine instrumentation with a VM1000 installed. The
radios are new, SL40 Apollo com, 327 Garmin transponder, PS501 intercom,
Garmin 295 color moving map and the standard flight instruments. There is
no vacuum system installed but the panel is cut to accept flight gyros if
required. This aircraft must sell as I have built another one and it will be
ready for flight this spring.
This aircraft is 10 inside and out. The base
color is a 2000 BMW metal flake silver, trimmed with a beautiful blue and
black highlights. The paint is immaculate. The registration letters are
decals and are easily removed. The transfer of registry from Canada to the
US is well documented.
3-03-04: Well I finally got rid of enough snow to enable me to get off the grass strip today and test the MT prop. I like it, I like it a lot. As many of you know I had a two blade Hartzell on this HRII before and a three blade Hartzell on the F1. With the two blade there was this annoying “thump” in the airplane, enough that my lower instrument panel used to vibrate and passengers could see my wing tips move. This is now gone! The prop spools up faster and when you push the throttle forward the plane accelerates noticeably faster than with the two blade. Also the plane is much quieter; I noticed this, as did a friend on the ground. It feels like a turbine, the way is speeds up and sounds.
With low ceilings and no wheel pants I have no idea regarding any changes in top speed. I would gladly give up some top speed to achieve the smoothness that I feel with this prop. I was very happy with the three blade Hartzell; it was not quite as smooth but pulled at least as well as this MT. The main disadvantage with the three blade Hartzell is the added weight. This is still acceptable on the F1 but not on my HRII, due to the aft location of the main wheels on the HRII. This particular MT prop is the aerobatic model and it is kind of cool how it starts. The blades fail in the coarse position and until you have enough oil pressure to cycle the prop they stay that way, sort of lugging the engine for a few seconds until you see/feel the blade angle change. Then it smoothes right out, way cool….
If someone was working on a fixed budget when building a new Rocket I would recommend cutting corners on the panel and going with the MT. Tom Martin
Tom Gummo's HRII
4-12-03: I bugged Tom Gummo, AKA "Gummibear," for a few pics of what he describes as the "World's Slowest Rocket." Ha Ha! He's funny. I'm flying a Stinson at 100 knots and he's complaining about a Rocket that only goes more than twice as fast!!
Tom tells me that he has a stock 250 HP 540 powering his plane. He says he can't stand to quit flying it long enough to paint it. The pictures show it prior to its first flight. It now has fairings but still is not painted - Gas or Paint? Tom says "Gas wins every time."
Test pilot (to make the insurance company happy), Jim, is in the Rocket with happy builder (because it's finished!), Tom standing in front of the plane. Tom's friend, John Starn, AKA "Kabong," helped Tom buck rivets and bend tin, but I don't have a picture of him.
Dennis Hackbarth
's HRII4-12-03: I finally got a few pics of Dennis's Rocket while at Greencastle, IN last Saturday. This was one of the first Rockets that I ever saw. IIRC, it was in front of Mark Frederick's tent at Oshkosh several years ago. It made me go ga-ga for one of these machines. I knew I had to have one. What a beautiful paint scheme.
Fred Weaver's HRII
Update 3-7-03: It flies!
2-28-03: The Rocket is simply a joy to fly. Plenty of power. The plane flies so nice and straight. Almost no trim required in lateral/roll... Visibility out of the Rocket is unbelievable. I feel like a F16 pilot. Take off and landing are very straight forward and just like RV4. No problems with shimmy at all (yet). Rockets are winners! Here is what I can say for sure..... You are going to be very happy with it.
I have been reading your upholstery stuff and at this point, I'm pretty sure I will be doing my own thing. There is a local gal that wants to help select colors and I'm all for it.
I've also learned a lot about engines. I'm sure a person can build up an economical 540 that will work just fine. However, my experience with PowerSport Engines/Bart LeBlond is just so good. My cylinders are so identical across the spectrum. I am so happy with those guys, I would recommend them in a heartbeat.
Keep on building. Weav
Update 2-19-03: Electronic ignition and number six CHT fine, the problem was oil on the lower spark plugs. Now the Lycoming 540 runs great, smooth all the way to full power. Rpm drop on magneto 150, rpm drop on electronic ignition 30. No leaks of any kind and a really fun airplane to fly, RV grin ++.
2-19-03: It flies! Fred flew his Rocket this morning 2-19-03 at 8:am PST for a little over an hour. The Rocket flew great. Needs a little work on the electronic ignition, runs rough at full power. CHT on number six (next to the oil cooler) was running hot and oil temps went hot during slow flight. Fred reports that it flies great and is a tight flying airplane with only a little right rudder needed. Luc
2-11-03: Just some pics to show you where we are at this morning. Engine run and prop cycle after lunch. Inspection Thursday. Flying Friday.
Sure looks homely without the pants on. Really looks good with the cowl and the pants. It weighs 1168 pounds. 580 on the left main, 567 on the right main and 21 on the tailwheel. Talk to you later, Fred Weaver
2-12-03: Ok guys.... N686X is almost ready to fly. Today I need to tidy up some wiring and fire up the radios, bolt in the seat belts (front seat only), calibrate the fuel gauges, and find something like a seat to sit on. The engine ran fine and prop cycled good also. The airplane weighs 1168 pounds and has an IO-540 D4A5 for power. Good oil pressure throughout the rpm range.

3-23-04: Here's a few pics from Fred Weaver's
recent flight. I'm so jealous. Vince
Jim Cash's F-1 Rocket next to Chuck McCurry's new F-1
Guys, for those thinking of using the new TruTrak wing leveler, you can see the 21/4'' head on this panel. Also, on the left is Van's deluxe throttle quadrant which I like better than Mark's expensive one. On the right is the EXP Bus II that we have been talking about. Jim
Bobby Hester's F-1 Rocket
Here's a few pics of Bobby Hester's Rocket sent to me. Looks great.
Bob Marshall's F-1 Rocket
I don't have any info on Bob's plane, just a couple pics shamelessly ripped from the Matronics site. Sure looks nice!
Brian McMullan's HRII
As you can see the finishing touches are still required, hopefully soon.
My first project was a non-flying Mustang II, purchased in 1982. Fixed and flown for 14 years, then totally rebuilt in 1994. It was an Oshkosh 1995 award winner and Hamilton Grand Champion. Gord Baxter, an avid RVer, said "Now what?" and the Mustang was sold and a Rocket started Oct. 31, 1996.
The Rocket project was built in a single car garage in Guelph and assembled in a friends hangar, Garry Wolf CYKF, and now is in the same hangar as Terry Jantzi. Thanks also to Tom Martin, who forged the way with his first red Rocket. Tom helped by answering many questions and allowing me to take tons of pics. Mark Frederick's sliding canopy was used.
First flight was April 13, 2000, EXCITING, right wing heavy.... a little tab fixed that. And thanks to John Harmon, who I suspect is just getting his sanity back. Sure, I made a few mistakes. I just made it right and chalked it up to the experience of my first building project. The next one will be easier, right?
When stripes and paint are finished I will send more pics.
Brian Mc Mullan Retired living on Roblin Lake Ameliasburgh Ontario Canada
KOK1AO
Jim Cash's F-1 Rocket
Greg, I am leaving for Texas for about three weeks, but upon return I will try and duplicate your conditions. I takeoff here at 3000' MSL and it will be somewhat colder, so there will be some differences. Overall, your numbers sound exactly the same as mine. I do run two mags as opposed to the electronic ignitions. Otherwise, our engines should be the same. On the dyno my engine showed a bit less than 300 HP.
A couple of numbers that I recall on my last trip to Texas look like this: (10.5K' and OAT around 50 degrees)
18''MP/2200 RPM/9.7 GPH----185 KTS TAS
19''MP/2200RPM/10.7 GPH----195 KTS TAS
21'' MP/2300 RPM/11.7 GPH---208 KTS TAS
The fuel flow goes up quickly with RPM increase and with marginal increase in airspeed. I was mainly interested here with economy cruise settings. As you will note on future cross countries, it doesn't take much to get the airplane past 180 KTS. But, it takes fuel to go fast. My response to someone who recently asked how fast the F-1 would go was, "depends on who is paying for the gas."
On a cold day (40 F) and 4500' at 25 square I will indicate around 235 MPH. That varies a bunch. On a real cold day that will go up between 240 and 250MPH IAS. On a hot day in Texas that will go down to 225 IAS. At sea level in Texas on a cool day, it hauls ass--- close to 250 MPH indicated and an initial climb rate of almost 4000FPM(on the pull it actually will exceed that)---that rate decreases fairly quickly as you climb though.
I have a couple of friends up here that love Glasair 3s and want to compare them with the Rocket. You guys will get that if you haven't already. Here is my answer. First, I don't like retractable gear in these small light aircraft. I flew real retracts that cost upward to $50M for 30 years and had too many problems with them. The good part was that Uncle Sam paid the bill when we could not get them down. I do really like carbon composite F-16 type aircraft, but not fiberglass airframes---had lots of boats and don't like the hairline cracks. I have also experienced several lightning strikes, and you wouldn't want one of those in a Glasair. I hear all kind of high numbers from these guys, but they are burning 16-18 GPH. There is not that much difference if we are willing to burn that much fuel. How-some-ever, here is the biggee---one of these friends just did the weight-and-balance on his new Glasair 2---1450 pounds with a 180 HP engine. Can't wait to fly some formation with this cat.
Of course its all in fun, but Van describes it best. If he wanted to break speed records he would certainly have designed a different wing. This airplane is designed to do everything very well, but nothing "better than all the rest"---sounds like the old F-4 Fighter (Big Ugly), huh, Greg. The stall is reasonable and the max speed is reasonable giving a very respectable ratio of over 4 to 1. You won't outrun a Glasair 3, but you might out climb him---and you are all metal.
See, I can even bore you guys. It gets interesting when an RV-8 type walks up to the Black Airplane singing the 8s praises. Mark has witnessed my uncontrolled response to that. The best one is simply, "Let's go fly." Jim Cash
A little story from Jim for a few belly laughs:
F-1 Rocket’s TP Mission
My name is Cash. Jim Cash. I am a pilot. An F-1 Pilot. The names in this story have been changed to protect---. I can't remember, but they were changed to protect something. Give me a break. I'm 63 years old.
The mission (and I chose to accept it) was planned with one purpose in mind. That single-minded purpose was to attack the Ball Bearing Factory located at Muleshoe, Montana, the most heavily defended city in Montana. This factory is known to produce parts for the assembly of the rollover prone, gas-guzzling vehicle we call "The SUV". You know, the one Bill O'Reilly talks about excessively every night on “The Factor". We have high hopes that a single, high-angle, dive bomb pass, delivering numerous rolls of high-grade toilet paper (TP) will slow the production of this massively destructive vehicle. This is my story. You, the readers, have no choice. I will take you on this mission of massive mercy.
In our opinion the only vehicle capable of successfully penetrating the Muleshoe defense is the new, state-of-the-art, Team Rocket, F-1. I'm a Pilot, an F-1 Pilot, and I know. Let me be clear about this. Details describing the reasons for selecting the F-1 will be made available later in this Operations Order.
Takeoff is early, immediately following a